Authorship in architecture encompasses the creative process of designing and constructing buildings, and it involves different approaches and strategies. Two contrasting approaches to authorship are type and invention. Type refers to the use of established building typologies and precedents as a framework for design, while invention emphasizes the creation of original and innovative architectural solutions. This essay explores the dichotomy between type and invention in architecture, examining their distinct characteristics and their impact on the design process and the built environment.
Type-based authorship relies on established building types and precedents as a foundation for design. Architects who adopt this approach draw inspiration from recognizable and functional typologies such as houses, schools, or museums. They work within the established parameters of these typologies while seeking to innovate within those frameworks. Type-based design allows for a sense of familiarity and coherence with existing architectural language and typological conventions. Architects like Peter Zumthor and Alvaro Siza Vieira have demonstrated the mastery of type-based authorship, creating designs that respect and enhance the qualities of familiar building types while infusing them with new interpretations and spatial experiences.
Invention-based authorship embraces originality and innovation in architectural design. Architects who follow this approach aim to break away from conventional typologies and design solutions. They seek to create unique and groundbreaking designs that challenge existing norms and push the boundaries of architectural possibilities. Invention-based design often involves the creation of new architectural languages, unconventional forms, and experimental construction techniques. Architects such as Frank Gehry and Zaha Hadid exemplify this approach, as they constantly explore new frontiers, embracing technological advancements and creating designs that captivate and astonish with their unprecedented forms and spatial experiences.
Achieving a balance between type and invention in architectural design is a delicate task. Architects often find themselves navigating between the desire for innovation and the need for functional and contextual appropriateness. While type-based authorship offers a sense of familiarity and functional efficiency, invention-based authorship allows for the exploration of uncharted territory and the creation of designs that challenge conventions. Successful designs strike a balance between these approaches, taking inspiration from established typologies while introducing inventive and transformative elements that enrich the architectural discourse.
The interplay between type and invention in architectural authorship reflects the tension between tradition and innovation. Type-based design draws inspiration from established typologies, providing familiarity, and functional efficiency, while invention-based design embraces originality and innovation, pushing the boundaries of architectural possibilities. Achieving a balance between these approaches allows architects to create designs that are rooted in cultural and historical context while introducing transformative elements that challenge conventions. The interplay between type and invention contributes to the richness and diversity of the built environment, shaping cities, and inspiring future generations of architects to explore the potential of architectural design.
Comments